Understanding the Federal Tort Claims Act: A Different Path to Justice
- Rawls Law Group

- Aug 15
- 4 min read
When medical malpractice occurs at Veterans Affairs hospitals, military medical facilities, or federally-funded clinics, the path to justice runs through federal rather than state courts. The Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) provides this avenue, but it operates very differently from typical state medical malpractice cases.
Why Federal Law Applies
The government generally cannot be sued without its consent. The FTCA represents Congress's limited waiver of sovereign immunity, allowing certain lawsuits against the United States for negligent acts by federal employees acting within their job duties.
This means when a VA doctor, military physician, or federally-funded clinic employee commits malpractice, the lawsuit is against the United States government, not the individual healthcare provider.
The Administrative Claim Requirement
Before filing any federal court lawsuit, you must first submit a detailed administrative claim to the appropriate federal agency. This isn't optional—it's mandatory. The claim must include:
A clear description of what happened
When and where the incident occurred
The legal basis for your claim
The amount of damages you're seeking
Supporting documentation and evidence
You have two years from discovering the malpractice to file this administrative claim. Miss this deadline, and you lose your right to pursue the case forever.
The Six-Month Wait
After filing your administrative claim, the government has six months to investigate and respond. They might:
Accept responsibility and settle the claim
Deny the claim entirely
Request additional information
Simply not respond within six months
Only after this six-month period (or an earlier denial) can you file a federal court lawsuit. Then you have an additional six months to file suit, regardless of when you submitted the original administrative claim.
Key Differences from State Cases
No Jury Trials: All FTCA cases are decided by federal judges, not juries. This changes litigation strategy significantly.
Federal Law Applies: The case is governed by federal statutes and precedents, not state medical malpractice law.
Different Damage Rules: Some states limit certain types of damages, while federal law may be more or less generous depending on the circumstances.
Sovereign Immunity Limits: The government retains immunity for discretionary decisions and certain other situations.

The Discretionary Function Exception
One of the most significant FTCA limitations is the discretionary function exception. The government cannot be sued for policy decisions or actions requiring judgment and choice. This can apply to:
Treatment decisions involving medical judgment
Resource allocation decisions
Policy choices about care standards
However, this exception doesn't protect against violations of mandatory regulations or clearly negligent care decisions.
Recent Developments for Military Personnel
Historically, active duty military personnel couldn't sue the government for medical malpractice under the Feres doctrine. However, recent changes allow certain claims for medical malpractice unrelated to military service, such as routine medical care that would be available to civilians.
This represents a significant shift, opening potential recovery for service members previously barred from any compensation.
Common FTCA Medical Malpractice Scenarios
Delayed Cancer Diagnosis: VA physicians failing to follow up on suspicious test results
Surgical Errors: Preventable complications during operations at military hospitals
Emergency Room Negligence: Misdiagnosis or delayed treatment at federal facilities
Medication Errors: Wrong prescriptions or dosages at government clinics
Birth Injuries: Complications during delivery at military medical centers
The Importance of Documentation
FTCA cases require extensive documentation because you're essentially asking the government to pay damages from taxpayer funds. Federal judges expect thorough proof of negligence and damages. This includes:
Complete medical records from all providers
Expert medical testimony explaining the standard of care
Detailed economic analysis of losses
Clear evidence linking negligence to injuries
Calculating Damages
FTCA damages can include:
Medical expenses (past and future)
Lost income and reduced earning capacity
Pain and suffering
Loss of consortium for spouses
In wrongful death cases, economic support and companionship losses
However, punitive damages are not available against the government, regardless of how egregious the conduct.
Why Specialized Experience Matters
FTCA cases involve unique procedural requirements, different legal standards, and federal judges who may be unfamiliar with medical malpractice issues. Success requires attorneys who understand both federal procedure and medical negligence law.
The government employs experienced defense attorneys and has access to extensive medical expertise. Effective representation requires matching these resources with knowledgeable legal counsel and qualified medical experts.
Time Sensitivity
FTCA deadlines are unforgiving. Missing the two-year administrative claim deadline or the six-month lawsuit filing period ends your case permanently. Additionally, evidence preservation is crucial—government medical records can be extensive but may be difficult to obtain without proper legal channels.
A Complex but Important Process
While FTCA procedures are more complex than typical state court cases, they provide an important avenue for accountability when government healthcare fails patients. Veterans, service members, and others receiving federal medical care deserve the same quality and safety standards as any other patients.
Understanding these rules helps ensure that those harmed by federal medical negligence can effectively pursue their legal rights within this specialized system.
Note: This article provides general information about federal law and should not be considered legal advice. FTCA cases involve complex procedural requirements that require experienced legal counsel.





Comments