- Jul 25, 2024
- 2 min read
We wouldn’t take no for an answer and appealed the decision to deny compensation. The great news is that a federal judge took the time to ask detailed questions about our medical expert and the scientific literature. This judge agreed that the lower court had not acknowledged how strong our medical theory was and had improperly dismissed the case.
This decision today, although exciting and favorable for our client, does not end the journey. This hearing only related to the question of timing of the injury, and we must still prevail on other questions about this medical condition. And so, it’s back to work!